Govern AI for firms that service regulated banks

Ten to two hundred staff, distributed teams, and bank clients asking for proof in procurement. Airentect helps you answer with evidence, not assurances.

APRA-regulated context

What finance and insurance suppliers need to evidence

Professional services and technology suppliers to banks and insurers need operational proof, not verbal assurances, when clients ask how AI is governed.

APRA letter and enforcement

APRA expects preventative controls and inventory, not policy alone. Where AI risks are unmanaged, stronger supervisory action may follow.

Read our APRA guide →

CPS 234 prompt gap

Information security capability must match material risk. Browser-based AI prompts are a channel file DLP rarely inspects.

Prompt-layer controls →

Bank client due diligence

Advisory and supplier firms face AI governance questions in procurement. Answer with enforceable controls and exportable evidence.

Enquire for your firm →

Inventory and reporting

See which LLMs staff use, what data categories appear in prompts, and how policy actions were applied over time.

Request a walkthrough →

Suppliers to regulated banks

Your bank clients are asking how you govern AI

Professional services and advisory firms that service APRA-regulated financial institutions need more than a verbal policy. Airentect gives you the answer and the evidence to back it up.

APRA CPS 234 and the AI prompt gap

CPS 234 expects you to maintain information security capability proportional to threats. AI prompts are a new channel where sensitive client and operational data leaves your control without a file transfer. Airentect closes that gap at the browser prompt layer.

Read our APRA and prompt-layer guide